TSTP Solution File: CSR151^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : CSR151^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 04:52:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : CSR151^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 20:18:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.up0AMHabJt/Vampire---4.8_14983
% 0.15/0.38  % (15095)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15096)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15094)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15095)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38  % (15097)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15093)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15092)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15091)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15097)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    $false),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) != $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) != $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.up0AMHabJt/Vampire---4.8_14983',con)).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.15/0.38    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.up0AMHabJt/Vampire---4.8_14983',ax)).
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15098)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (15090)Success in time 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------